There is something particularly satisfying about reaching the final instalment of a trilogy when the author has spent two books carefully laying the groundwork for a conclusion. London Match brings Len Deighton’s Game, Set and Match trilogy to a close, continuing Bernard Samson’s journey through the murky world of Cold War espionage. After the suspicions and complications of Berlin Game and Mexico Set, we arrive at a point where personal loyalties, professional responsibilities and the competing agendas of the intelligence services become increasingly difficult to separate. The result is another cracking spy thriller, full of intrigue, double-dealing and the sort of uncertainty that makes you question practically everything you have been told.

Bernard Samson remains the biggest reason I have enjoyed this trilogy so much. He is a thoroughly engaging protagonist, largely because he doesn’t behave like some impossibly capable fictional super-spy. He is experienced, observant and blessed with a wonderfully dry sense of humour, but he is also fallible, occasionally stubborn and frequently exasperated by the people who are supposed to be working towards the same objectives. I particularly enjoy his attitude towards the bureaucrats and senior officers who seem to believe that intelligence work can be managed through a combination of memos, meetings and carefully worded instructions.

Samson knows better, of course, but knowing that the system is flawed doesn’t mean he can escape it. He has to operate within its rules, even when those rules appear designed to protect the wrong people. I found that tension increasingly interesting as the trilogy progressed. His professional instincts are often sound, but personal loyalties complicate his judgement, and he cannot simply treat everyone around him as a potential source of intelligence. The people he cares about matter, which makes the business of deciding whom to trust considerably more difficult.

That human element gives London Match much of its emotional weight. The espionage plot is full of the shifting alliances and concealed motives we have come to expect from Deighton, but the consequences for Samson are not merely professional. His relationships have their own history, and the past cannot simply be set aside because the service has another problem to solve. I like that Deighton allows these personal complications to influence the story rather than treating them as an interruption to the supposedly more important business of international intelligence.

The Cold War setting remains central to the trilogy’s appeal. Deighton presents a world in which ideology provides the public justification for a great deal of activity that, on closer inspection, has rather more to do with national advantage, personal ambition and institutional survival. The struggle between East and West may be presented as a contest between competing political systems, but the people working inside those systems are rarely as principled or straightforward as the official rhetoric suggests.

One of the things I particularly appreciate is Deighton’s willingness to show the less glamorous side of intelligence work. Information is incomplete, decisions are made on uncertain evidence, and the consequences of getting things wrong can be considerable. Meanwhile, the people responsible for the decisions may be more concerned with avoiding embarrassment than acknowledging their mistakes. There is a sharp social commentary here about the way institutions protect themselves, often at the expense of the individuals who do the actual work.

That cynicism feels entirely appropriate to Samson’s world. Loyalty is demanded, but it is not always reciprocated. Careers can depend on political convenience, and the truth may be less valuable than a version of events that keeps everyone important out of trouble. Deighton understands that espionage is not simply a contest between clever agents on opposing sides. It is also a struggle against bureaucracy, professional jealousy and the uncomfortable realisation that your own side may be just as willing to manipulate you as the enemy.

Reading Deighton also offers an interesting perspective on the Cold War career of Jackson Lamb in Mick Herron’s Slough House series. Herron’s wonderfully foul-mouthed intelligence veteran can sometimes seem like a walking collection of bad habits, but beneath the insults and deliberate offensiveness lies someone who understands the service far better than most of the people running it.

Deighton’s novels provide a convincing picture of the professional environment in which someone like Lamb could have spent decades learning his trade. Samson encounters the same mixture of institutional self-interest, concealed agendas and senior officers whose priorities do not always match those of the people doing the dangerous work. It is easy to imagine Lamb developing his contempt for management culture in precisely this sort of environment.

There is a distinction between the two authors, naturally. Deighton follows an active intelligence officer negotiating the system, whereas Herron’s focus is the people the system has discarded. But both recognise that experience brings an understanding of how things really work, and that this knowledge is not necessarily appreciated by those in charge. Reading Deighton makes Lamb’s cynicism feel less like an eccentric personality trait and more like the accumulated wisdom of someone who has seen too much to believe the official line.

Naturally, London Match has some dated elements. The technology and methods of intelligence gathering belong firmly to their period, and Deighton’s intricate plotting occasionally demands close attention. The measured pace may also frustrate readers who prefer their spy fiction to deliver constant action. However, these are relatively minor flaws, and the slower accumulation of information is part of what makes the eventual revelations satisfying.

Ultimately, London Match is a strong conclusion to an excellent trilogy. It delivers the intrigue and thrills I want from a spy novel while giving Bernard Samson enough personality and emotional complexity to make his fate matter. The Cold War setting may now belong to history, but Deighton’s observations about bureaucracy, loyalty and the pursuit of power remain remarkably recognisable.

I’ve enjoyed spending time with Samson, even when I haven’t entirely trusted his judgement or been convinced he has all the answers. Deighton has created a world in which uncertainty is part of the job, and that makes for thoroughly absorbing reading. If you have enjoyed the first two books, this is an essential conclusion, and a very satisfying one at that.

Buy your copy here